<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kshuntley.com &#187; net-filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kshuntley.com/tags/net-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kshuntley.com</link>
	<description>The website and weblog of Kenneth Scott Huntley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:06:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon-wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whirlpool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editorial: ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based &#8211; Whirlpool Broadband News.
Must read editorial on the failure that will be the Great Firewall of China.
Make no mistake, this will be another Labor Bungle.  Although it won&#8217;t cause the loss of life the Insulation Affair did, it&#8217;s going to cost us far more money is lost productivity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://whirlpool.net.au/news/?id=1855">Editorial: ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based &#8211; Whirlpool Broadband News</a>.</p>
<p>Must read editorial on the failure that will be the Great Firewall of China.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, this will be another Labor Bungle.  Although it won&#8217;t cause the loss of life the Insulation Affair did, it&#8217;s going to cost us far more money is lost productivity and lost opportunity, even before the program costs, which will be huger than huge.</p>
<p>If you think the Global Economy will not be Internet driven (if it isn&#8217;t already) in the future, then you&#8217;re living in a dream world.  A country without Internet tomorrow will be as competitive as a country without roads was yesterday.  And here&#8217;s Kevin Rudd and the crew erecting 10kph speed limit signs.</p>
<p>And to what end?</p>
<p>This will do nothing to combat Child Pornography.</p>
<p>Not one thing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be as effective at fighting child porn as throwing out all your silverware, except it <em>sounds</em> more related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digihub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways &#124; Digihub Blog &#124; digihub.smh.com.au.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digihub.smh.com.au/Conroy%20abandons%20speed%20hump%20plans%20for%20Australia%27s%20freeways">Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways | Digihub Blog | digihub.smh.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China said to be blocking Web sites</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/china-said-to-be-blocking-web-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/china-said-to-be-blocking-web-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China said to be blocking Web sites &#8211; CNET News.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/China-said-to-be-blocking-Web-sites/2100-1028_3-6248447.html?part=rss&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20&amp;subj=news">China said to be blocking Web sites &#8211; CNET News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/china-said-to-be-blocking-web-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fatal flaws in website censorship plan, says report</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/fatal-flaws-in-website-censorship-plan-says-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/fatal-flaws-in-website-censorship-plan-says-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/fatal-flaws-in-website-censorship-plan-says-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fatal flaws in website censorship plan, says report.
Update: Net filtering trial delay &#8216;another Govt bungle&#8217;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/web/fatal-flaws-in-website-censorship-plan-says-report/2008/12/22/1229794328860.html">Fatal flaws in website censorship plan, says report</a>.</p>
<p>Update: <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/24/2454789.htm">Net filtering trial delay &#8216;another Govt bungle&#8217;.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/23/fatal-flaws-in-website-censorship-plan-says-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor plan to censor internet in shreds</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/labor-plan-to-censor-internet-in-shreds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/labor-plan-to-censor-internet-in-shreds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott-ludlam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/labor-plan-to-censor-internet-in-shreds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor plan to censor internet in shreds &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au.
Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, has written to critics saying that the so-called &#8220;live&#8221; trials would be &#8220;a closed network test and will not involve actual customers&#8221;
Huh?
A &#8220;live&#8221; trial &#8211; on a closed network without actual customers.
So, what&#8217;s this supposed to prove?
How dumb is Senator Conroy?  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/home/technology/labor-plan-to-censor-internet-in-shreds/2008/12/09/1228584820006.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1">Labor plan to censor internet in shreds &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, has written to critics saying that the so-called &#8220;live&#8221; trials would be &#8220;a closed network test and will not involve actual customers&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>A &#8220;live&#8221; trial &#8211; on a closed network without actual customers.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s this supposed to prove?</p>
<p>How dumb is Senator Conroy?  Is he really this dumb?  Or this maniuplative?  <strong>A live trial, by definition, is done with actual customers.</strong> This trial will prove nothing.  It&#8217;s a repeat of the June trials.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s now a total complete  waste of time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/labor-plan-to-censor-internet-in-shreds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telstra BigPond refuses to participate in net filter trials</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/telstra-bigpond-refuses-to-participate-in-net-filter-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/telstra-bigpond-refuses-to-participate-in-net-filter-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big-pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itnews-australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telstra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/telstra-bigpond-refuses-to-participate-in-net-filter-trials/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telstra BigPond refuses to participate in net filter trials &#8211; Internet &#8211; iTnews Australia.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/90687,telstra-bigpond-refuses-to-participate-in-net-filter-trials.aspx">Telstra BigPond refuses to participate in net filter trials &#8211; Internet &#8211; iTnews Australia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/09/telstra-bigpond-refuses-to-participate-in-net-filter-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSW calls Conroy on Euro filter fudge</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/22/nsw-calls-conroy-on-euro-filter-fudge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/22/nsw-calls-conroy-on-euro-filter-fudge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zdnet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/22/nsw-calls-conroy-on-euro-filter-fudge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NSW calls Conroy on Euro filter fudge: News &#8211; Software &#8211; ZDNet Australia.
I think Senator Conroy should use this opportunity to learn how to research before commenting.  Here&#8217;s a thought &#8211; there&#8217;s a wonderful research tool that&#8217;s just come out in the last 30 years; it&#8217;s called the Internet.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/NSW-calls-Conroy-on-Euro-filter-fudge/0,130061733,339293439,00.htm?feed=generic">NSW calls Conroy on Euro filter fudge: News &#8211; Software &#8211; ZDNet Australia</a>.</p>
<p>I think Senator Conroy should use this opportunity to learn how to research before commenting.  Here&#8217;s a thought &#8211; there&#8217;s a wonderful research tool that&#8217;s just come out in the last 30 years; it&#8217;s called the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/22/nsw-calls-conroy-on-euro-filter-fudge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Malone of iiNet: interview from CBC Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc-search-engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse-brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I found out Michael Malone of iiNet would be on the CBC podcast Search Engine.  I wanted to follow up with a link to the interview as the episode is now online.  I&#8217;m hoping to draw more attention to his comments as I think the &#8220;Clean Feed&#8221; is the kind of censorship that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/">Last week</a> I found out Michael Malone of iiNet would be on the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/index.html">CBC podcast Search Engine</a>.  I wanted to follow up with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/blog/2008/11/podcast_10_is_up.html">a link to the interview</a> as the episode is now online.  I&#8217;m hoping to draw more attention to his comments as I think the &#8220;Clean Feed&#8221; is the kind of censorship that will threaten our democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Malone of iiNet to be interviewed on next week&#8217;s Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc-search-engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse-brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/michael-malone-of-iinet-to-be-interviewed-on-next-weeks-search-engine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran, China- and Australia?
Ah sweet!  I love Search Engine, add it to your podcatcher!  This promises to be an interesting interview.  Jesse is good at these kinds of interviews, and I&#8217;m interested in hearing Mr. Malone talk at length about this.  I&#8217;ve reread the same three quotes of his as the news story went around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="entry-header"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/blog/2008/11/iran_china_and_australia_oz_mo.html">Iran, China- and Australia?</a></p>
<p>Ah sweet!  I love <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/index.html">Search Engine</a>, add it to your podcatcher!  This promises to be an interesting interview.  Jesse is good at these kinds of interviews, and I&#8217;m interested in hearing Mr. Malone talk at length about this.  I&#8217;ve reread the same three quotes of his as the news story went around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Filter Protest</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/internet-filter-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/internet-filter-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laurel-papworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/internet-filter-protest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laurel Papworth -Social Networks: Australia: Internet Filter Protest.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://silkcharm.blogspot.com/2008/11/australia-internet-filter-protest.html">Laurel Papworth -Social Networks: Australia: Internet Filter Protest</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/internet-filter-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

