<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kshuntley.com &#187; net-filter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kshuntley.com/tags/net-filter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kshuntley.com</link>
	<description>The website and weblog of Kenneth Scott Huntley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 04:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon-wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whirlpool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editorial: ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based &#8211; Whirlpool Broadband News.
Must read editorial on the failure that will be the Great Firewall of China.
Make no mistake, this will be another Labor Bungle.  Although it won&#8217;t cause the loss of life the Insulation Affair did, it&#8217;s going to cost us far more money is lost productivity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://whirlpool.net.au/news/?id=1855">Editorial: ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based &#8211; Whirlpool Broadband News</a>.</p>
<p>Must read editorial on the failure that will be the Great Firewall of China.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, this will be another Labor Bungle.  Although it won&#8217;t cause the loss of life the Insulation Affair did, it&#8217;s going to cost us far more money is lost productivity and lost opportunity, even before the program costs, which will be huger than huge.</p>
<p>If you think the Global Economy will not be Internet driven (if it isn&#8217;t already) in the future, then you&#8217;re living in a dream world.  A country without Internet tomorrow will be as competitive as a country without roads was yesterday.  And here&#8217;s Kevin Rudd and the crew erecting 10kph speed limit signs.</p>
<p>And to what end?</p>
<p>This will do nothing to combat Child Pornography.</p>
<p>Not one thing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be as effective at fighting child porn as throwing out all your silverware, except it <em>sounds</em> more related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2010/03/11/isp-filtering-policy-is-not-evidence-based/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digihub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways &#124; Digihub Blog &#124; digihub.smh.com.au.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digihub.smh.com.au/Conroy%20abandons%20speed%20hump%20plans%20for%20Australia%27s%20freeways">Conroy abandons speed hump plans for Australia&#8217;s freeways | Digihub Blog | digihub.smh.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2009/12/21/conroy-abandons-speed-hump-plans-for-australias-freeways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China blocks N.Y. Times, Ming Pao</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/24/china-blocks-ny-times-ming-pao/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/24/china-blocks-ny-times-ming-pao/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/24/china-blocks-ny-times-ming-pao/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China blocks N.Y. Times, Ming Pao.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/12/22/china-censorship.html">China blocks N.Y. Times, Ming Pao</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/24/china-blocks-ny-times-ming-pao/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British ISPs filtering Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/08/british-isps-filtering-wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/08/british-isps-filtering-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-watch-foundation-uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin-rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/08/british-isps-filtering-wikipedia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British ISPs filtering Wikipedia &#124; Digital Media &#8211; CNET News.
So when Stephen Conroy and Kevin Rudd and all the Labor Party hacks tell you that the Clean Feed will only filter out bad, evil, vile pornographic sites, now you know what they have in mind.  Oh yes, Wikipedia, it&#8217;s vile.  Wikipedia is the scum of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10116543-93.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">British ISPs filtering Wikipedia | Digital Media &#8211; CNET News</a>.</p>
<p>So when Stephen Conroy and Kevin Rudd and all the Labor Party hacks tell you that the Clean Feed will only filter out bad, evil, vile pornographic sites, now you know what they have in mind.  Oh yes, Wikipedia, it&#8217;s vile.  Wikipedia is the scum of the Internet, thrusting illegal porn down innocent throats.</p>
<p>This is why we need to say <strong>NO </strong>to the Clean Feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/08/british-isps-filtering-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children&#8217;s welfare groups slam net filters</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/03/childrens-welfare-groups-slam-net-filters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/03/childrens-welfare-groups-slam-net-filters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holly-doel-mackaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save-the-children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/03/childrens-welfare-groups-slam-net-filters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children&#8217;s welfare groups slam net filters &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au.
Hey Senator Conroy, are you listening?
I love the opening paragraph of this story:
Support for the Government&#8217;s plan to censor the internet has hit rock bottom, with even some children&#8217;s welfare groups now saying that that the mandatory filters, aimed squarely at protecting kids, are ineffective and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/childrens-welfare-groups-slam-net-filters/2008/11/28/1227491813497.html">Children&#8217;s welfare groups slam net filters &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Senator Conroy, are you listening?</p>
<p>I love the opening paragraph of this story:</p>
<blockquote><p>Support for the Government&#8217;s plan to censor the internet has hit rock bottom, with even some children&#8217;s welfare groups now saying that that the mandatory filters, aimed squarely at protecting kids, are ineffective and a waste of money.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, Holly Doel-Mackaway, adviser with &#8220;Save the Children&#8221;, has slammed the filter.  Is Conroy going to tar her with the same child-porn-advocate brush he paints other critics of the filter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/12/03/childrens-welfare-groups-slam-net-filters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Malone of iiNet: interview from CBC Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc-search-engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse-brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I found out Michael Malone of iiNet would be on the CBC podcast Search Engine.  I wanted to follow up with a link to the interview as the episode is now online.  I&#8217;m hoping to draw more attention to his comments as I think the &#8220;Clean Feed&#8221; is the kind of censorship that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/">Last week</a> I found out Michael Malone of iiNet would be on the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/index.html">CBC podcast Search Engine</a>.  I wanted to follow up with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/blog/2008/11/podcast_10_is_up.html">a link to the interview</a> as the episode is now online.  I&#8217;m hoping to draw more attention to his comments as I think the &#8220;Clean Feed&#8221; is the kind of censorship that will threaten our democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/20/michael-malone-iinet-interview-cbc-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Malone of iiNet to be interviewed on next week&#8217;s Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc-search-engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse-brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/michael-malone-of-iinet-to-be-interviewed-on-next-weeks-search-engine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran, China- and Australia?
Ah sweet!  I love Search Engine, add it to your podcatcher!  This promises to be an interesting interview.  Jesse is good at these kinds of interviews, and I&#8217;m interested in hearing Mr. Malone talk at length about this.  I&#8217;ve reread the same three quotes of his as the news story went around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="entry-header"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/blog/2008/11/iran_china_and_australia_oz_mo.html">Iran, China- and Australia?</a></p>
<p>Ah sweet!  I love <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/index.html">Search Engine</a>, add it to your podcatcher!  This promises to be an interesting interview.  Jesse is good at these kinds of interviews, and I&#8217;m interested in hearing Mr. Malone talk at length about this.  I&#8217;ve reread the same three quotes of his as the news story went around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/malone-interviewed-next-week-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian ISPs pan government-mandated &#8216;Net filtering plan&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/australian-isps-pan-government-mandated-net-filtering-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/australian-isps-pan-government-mandated-net-filtering-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ars-technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telstra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/australian-isps-pan-government-mandated-net-filtering-plan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian ISPs pan government-mandated &#8216;Net filtering plan.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081111-isps-talk-back-about-australias-non-optional-filtering-planaustralian-isps-pan-government-mandated-net-filtering-plan.html">Australian ISPs pan government-mandated &#8216;Net filtering plan</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/13/australian-isps-pan-government-mandated-net-filtering-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian government calls for live Internet filter trial</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/australian-government-calls-for-live-internet-filter-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/australian-government-calls-for-live-internet-filter-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/australian-government-calls-for-live-internet-filter-trial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iTWire &#8211; Australian government calls for live Internet filter trial.
Ahem.  Third paragraph of this story:  &#8220;Most of the filters were unable to block content carried by non-web protocols.&#8221;
In other words, if you share stuff like Kiddie Porn via Limewire or BitTorrent, which, no doubt, is how it&#8217;s being transfered because no one is stupid enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.itwire.com/content/view/21628/53/">iTWire &#8211; Australian government calls for live Internet filter trial</a>.</p>
<p>Ahem.  Third paragraph of this story:  &#8220;Most of the filters were unable to block content carried by non-web protocols.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, if you share stuff like Kiddie Porn via Limewire or BitTorrent, which, no doubt, is how it&#8217;s being transfered because no one is stupid enough to browse, view, host, operate or own a Kiddie Porn website, this multimillion dollar project is useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/australian-government-calls-for-live-internet-filter-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net censorship plan backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/net-censorship-plan-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/net-censorship-plan-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fielding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick-xenophon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics-australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen-conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney-morning-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/net-censorship-plan-backlash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net censorship plan backlash &#8211; BizTech &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au.
Stephen Conroy lies like a dog.  So yesterday in Question Time he refuses to retract his statement that this filter is already in place in countries like Canada &#8211; a bold faced lie; an untruth to mislead the public.
It&#8217;s not just that this Labor Government has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 179px"><a href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/"><img title="Freedom" src="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/freedom.jpg" alt="Courtesy of the Somebody Think Of The Children blog" width="169" height="238" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy of the &quot;Somebody Think Of The Children&quot; blog</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/11/11/1226318639085.html">Net censorship plan backlash &#8211; BizTech &#8211; Technology &#8211; smh.com.au</a>.</p>
<p>Stephen Conroy lies like a dog.  So yesterday in Question Time he refuses to retract his statement that this filter is already in place in countries like Canada &#8211; a bold faced lie; an untruth to mislead the public.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just that this Labor Government has shown it is just as out of touch as the previous Liberal Government on Tech issues, my disappointment lies with the fact that this kind of censorship is a complete attack on Freedom itself.</p>
<p>Pay particular attention to Senators Xenophon and Fielding &#8211; Labor is courting them hard to support them, and both want to add to the censorship list &#8211; yes it starts with Kiddie Porn, and who&#8217;d object to that?  But now we&#8217;re talking all porn, and gambling to boot.  What&#8217;s next?  Are we going to have to read from the Bible before visiting a site?  Oh well, don&#8217;t be ridiculous &#8211; only sites with Bible verses already existing on them will be allowed through the filter.</p>
<p>Which leads some to the question why am I so opposed to this if it will block Kiddie Porn?  If it works just a fraction, isn&#8217;t that the price to pay for the censorship of a few wrongly classified sites and a little (86%) loss in speed?</p>
<p>Well, aside from the fact that the list of &#8220;bad things&#8221; is growing and Australia is already so far behind the ball in the Tech game that it will hurt our already struggling IT industry &#8211; just last week the <a href="http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/08/ballmer-tells-oz-get-with-the-broadband/">CEO of Microsoft was calling on Australia</a> to build the infrastructure to give us what most of the developed world already has: broadband (and if you think you&#8217;ve got it, you don&#8217;t.  Go see broadband in America.  Our Nation is stuck in 1987) &#8211; aside from all of that, he&#8217;s the problem:</p>
<p>No one who wants Kiddie Porn just types &#8220;Kiddie Porn&#8221; into Google.  Yes, we&#8217;re spending millions (nearing billions) on this, and forsaking our rights and it won&#8217;t even stop illegal P2P file sharing, which, no doubt is where most of the Kiddie Porn trading is done.</p>
<p>This is the equivalent of stopping Bank Robberies by lowering the speed limits in this country to 20 kph, so that get-away cars will be easier to catch.  It totally disregards the fact that the crims will speed anyway, it will hurt everyone else, it will destroy business, and it will make us look like bloomin&#8217; idiots to the rest of the world because we are so stupid.</p>
<p>Except it&#8217;s worse; we&#8217;re not talking about making it to work on time, we&#8217;re talking about being able to speak your mind.  We&#8217;re talking about building a police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshuntley.com/2008/11/12/net-censorship-plan-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
